In-Ear Noise Dosimetry System

ABSTRACT

An in-ear noise dosimeter in the form of an earplug which senses sound in the ear canal using an eartip which has a sound delivery channel that couples sound at the end closest to the eardrum to an earplug microphone. The earplug can communicate wirelessly with a remote data collection and processing system. A dock unit for storing the earplugs when not worn can compensate for differences in unoccluded-ear versus occluded-ear responses by an acoustic compensator. An electronic compensation filter can be modified by a proximity switch in the earplug which changes state when the earplug is worn in the ear versus stored in a dock unit. The dosimeter can also have a temperature sensor for sensing human body temperature and remotely-located wireless LEDs used to alert the user of high noise dosage. Data can also be downloaded from the earplug using a reader unit.

REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims one or more inventions which were disclosed inU.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/497,970, filed Apr. 26, 2017, U.S.Provisional Application Number 62/328,065, filed Apr. 27, 2016, entitled“In-Ear Noise Dosimetry System”, and Provisional Application Number62/409,930, filed Oct. 19, 2016, entitled “In-Ear Noise DosimetrySystem”. The benefit under 35 USC §119(e) of these United Statesapplications is hereby claimed, and the aforementioned applications arehereby incorporated herein by reference.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under SBIR grant1R43OH011145-01, awarded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control andPrevention. The government has certain rights in the invention.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The invention pertains to the field of measurement of sound levels. Moreparticularly, the invention pertains to an in-ear noise dosimeter.

Description of Related Art

Hearing loss accounted for at least 14% of occupational illness in 2007,and approximately S242M is spent annually on worker's compensation forhearing loss disability. According to the CDC, four million workers goto work each day in damaging noise, while ten million in the U.S. suffernoise-related hearing loss. Approximately 82% of the occupational noiseinduced hearing loss (NIHL) was reported in the manufacturing sector.Occupational NIHL is an outsized problem considering our capability tovirtually eliminate it.

Sound Pressure Level is measured in decibels (dB), and for the purposesof indicating the effect on human beings of sound pressure level in air,can be frequency-weighted to compensate for the sensitivity of the humanear. The most commonly used of such scales is “A” frequency weighting,so sound levels for occupational exposure are usually expressed in dBAunits, meaning sound pressure in air measured in decibels and weightedby the “A” frequency weighting system. The decibel is a base-10logarithmic unit, so that a difference of 6 dB indicates a doubling insound pressure level, 20 dB indicates a factor of ten times, 40 dB anincrease of 100 times, and so on. Thus, a sound level of 100 dBA is 10times a sound level of 80 dBA, and what might appear to be a numericallysmall difference in dBA is actually a very large difference noiseexposure. The standard for sound level meters is set out in ANSIspecification S1.4, which is incorporated herein by reference.

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), apart of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), recommends that employeesshould not be exposed to sound at a level of 85 dBA for eight hours ormore.

The OSHA Occupational Noise Exposure standard states that an employeemust not receive sound at a time-weighted average (TWA) level of over 90dBA of over an eight-hour period, and if an employee is exposed to 85 dBTWA, or above, over an eight-hour period, the employer shall administera continuing, effective hearing conservation program. The standard alsostates that the employer shall establish and maintain an audiometrictesting program by making audiometric testing available to all employeeswhose exposures equal or exceed an eight-hour TWA of 85 dB. Audiometrictests shall be conducted by a trained professional. If hearingthresholds shifts are measured in an employee, over time, hearingprotectors and training of their use are required.

According to OSHA regulations, an employee may be exposed to 85 dBA TWAover a 16 hour period, compared to 90 dBA TWA for 8 hours. The change indecibels required for doubling the allowed exposure time is called the“exchange rate.” For the OSHA regulation, the exchange rate is 5 dB.

Employees who are exposed to a TWA of 85 dB over eight hours, and do nothave an audiogram baseline measurement, are required by the regulationsto wear hearing protecting devices (HPDs) at no cost to the employee.Employers are required to provide training regarding use of the HPD andto ensure proper initial use.

Although, legally, employees may be exposed to 90 dBA for eight hours, areview of research by NIOSH shows that significant NIHL can occur atlevels above 85 dBA for eight hours. NIOSH recommends a more restrictivemaximum of 85 dB TWA exposure with a 3 dB exchange rate. Hence, even a 3dB change in noise level is very significant.

Compliance with this standard is complicated and expensive regardingrecord retention, equipment and the involvement of professionals when ahearing conservation program is required.

In-ear personal noise dosimeters (iPNDs), like the one shown in priorart FIGS. 1 through 3, have been developed to address noise exposure inthe workplace. The system in FIGS. 1 through 3 comprises in-eardosimetry earplugs 2 (herein referred to as “earplugs” for brevity) thatcommunicate with an electronics unit using electrical cables 4. As seenin FIG. 2, the earplugs 2 worn in an ear 11 have a microphone 6 withinan earplug shell 8, and the shell is attached to an eartip 10. Theearplug shell 8 is generally cylindrically shaped, in this example. Theeartip 10 is also generally cylindrical in shape and has a sounddelivery channel (SDC) 12 that allows sound in an ear canal 14 to beacoustically coupled from the ear canal 14 to the microphone 6. In thisway, the microphone 6 can monitor the sound in the ear canal 14.

The eartip 10 and earplug shell 8 provide a barrier to the acousticnoise from the user's environment to reduce the noise exposure of theuser. Eartips 10 may be constructed using foam, silicone, rubber orother materials that can form an acoustic seal with the walls of an earcanal 14, and can be custom fitting or universal fitting. Eartips 10 maybe removable, as in the case with foam eartips, or permanently attachedto the earplug shell 8, as is the case with custom-molded siliconeearplugs, as known in the art.

The noise that reaches the ear canal 14, due to earplug 2 vibration andflanking acoustic transmission paths, is sensed by the earplugmicrophone 6. The microphone output is transmitted via electrical cables4 to an electronics unit (not shown) that determines noise exposure,continuously. In this way, the user is protected from ambient noise inthe environment, and the noise exposure of the user is monitored.

If the user needs to remove the earplugs 2, the electrical cables 4 maybe draped behind the neck and over the shoulders so that the earplugs 2lay on the chest, as seen in FIG. 3. The microphones 6 will then monitorthe noise at the chest location, as an alternative for monitoring thenoise at the center-head location, which is a preferred monitoringlocation.

In this way, if the user removes the earplugs 2 to talk to a co-workerduring face-to-face communications, a higher noise exposure is measuredby the electronics unit because the noise level at the unprotected chestlocation is higher than the noise level in a protected ear canal 14. Thechest measurement is an alternative position compared to the measurementat the center head; however, the shoulder is a more common location tomeasure unprotected noise due to sound reflection from the chest andcloser location of the shoulder to the head.

A problem with this technique of monitoring noise exposure in the earcanal 14, when the user is wearing the earplugs 2, as well as outside ofthe ear 11, when the user is not, is that the microphones 6 in theearplugs 2 are not measuring the correct acoustic transfer functions.The chest location is not as desirable as the shoulder location.Moreover, when the earplugs 2 are worn in the ear 11, the microphone 6response should be compensated by the diffuse field response of thehuman ear, at least to some degree; otherwise, the in-ear measurementsare too high and overestimate the exposure.

The noise dose measured assumes an unoccluded ear canal, which has adiffuse field response that significantly amplifies sound in the regionof 2,000 Hz to 5,000 Hz due to acoustical resonances of the ear as seenin the ITU-T P.58 specification (Head and Torso Simulator ForTelephonometry) table 3/P.58. A 14 dB boost can be seen at 2,500 Hz.When an iPND is used, the pressure measured in the ear canal is theactual pressure in the ear canal, assuming negligible occluded earresonance.

This means that the iPND noise dose measurements are significantly toohigh. They should be compensated by the diffuse field response of theear, by at least some degree, but are not, at this time. However, ifthey were compensated using an electrical filter, then when the earplugswere draped over the shoulder, the earplug microphone measurement wouldbe incorrect because the microphone signal would be compensated by thein-ear compensation filter, but the earplugs would not be occluding theear canal, and the filter shouldn't be used. That is, it would bebeneficial to have two frequency responses for the system: one when theearplug is worn in the ear, and another when the earplug is not.Currently, iPNDs do not have this important feature.

Moreover, although wired iPNDs are effective, the wires connecting theearplugs to the dosimeter are problematic to many workers. The wiresconduct vibration to the earplug causing earplug vibration andsubstantial sound generation. Moreover, when wired earplugs are usedwith earmuffs for double hearing protection, the wires create gaps thatdeteriorate attenuation provided by the earmuffs. Wires also tend to getcaught on machinery or other objects causing a significant safetyhazard. When moving the head, there is tugging on the earplugs that maycause an annoyance, and if wearing earmuffs over the earplugs, the wiresput force on the earplugs also causing discomfort. Wires also reducereliability, due to breakage, and the connectors needed are costly andcan also fail. If the user is wearing hazardous materials headgear orother headgear that needs to create a gas-tight seal around the head,wires are also a problem as they break the gas-tight barrier.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention presents an in-ear noise dosimeter in the form of anearplug comprising an earplug shell, or body, that contains earplugcomponents. An eartip, which has a sound delivery channel thatacoustically couples sound at the proximal end of the eartip (closest tothe eardrum when worn in an ear) to an earplug microphone, is attachedto the earplug shell.

When the earplug is worn in a human ear, the microphone senses sound inthe ear canal. The microphone communicates electrically with earplugelectronics, located within the earplug. A battery, preferablyrechargeable, is used in one embodiment to provide power for the earplugelectronics and microphone. An earplug transceiver is used tocommunicate with a remote data collection and processing system.

In one wire-free embodiment, the earplug in this embodiment is free ofexternal electrical cables and connectors. The earplug, in oneembodiment, incorporates a switch that modifies the response of an audiosignal derived from the microphone output depending on whether theearplug is in the ear or not in the ear. The invention also may make useof a temperature sensor for sensing human body temperature andremotely-located wireless light emitting diodes (LEDs) used to alert theuser of high noise dosage.

The invention also presents a dock unit for storing the earplugs whennot worn in the ear. In one embodiment of the invention, the dock unitcompensates for differences in unoccluded-ear versus occluded-earresponses for measuring the unprotected and protected noise dose byincorporating an acoustic compensator.

The invention also presents a reader unit for downloading data from theearplug, charging an earplug battery and calibrating the earplug.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING

FIGS. 1-3 show prior art in-ear dosimeters.

FIG. 4 shows an embodiment incorporating in-ear dosimetry earplugs and adock unit.

FIG. 5a shows a cross section of an embodiment of an in-ear dosimetryearplug.

FIG. 5b shows a top view of the earplug from FIG. 5 a.

FIG. 6 shows how the earplugs can be stored in or on a dock unit.

FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of an embodiment of the earplug electronicsfrom FIGS. 4 through 6.

FIG. 8 shows a block diagram of a prior art RFID chip.

FIG. 9 shows a cross section of the embodiment of a dock unit from FIG.4.

FIG. 10 shows a block diagram of the dock unit electronics and otherdock unit components.

FIG. 11 shows an in-ear dosimetry system employing a neckloop as atransceiver antenna.

FIG. 12 shows a cross section of an earplug and dock unit for thisembodiment.

FIG. 13 shows a block diagram of the earplugs from FIG. 11.

FIG. 14 shows a block diagram of the dock unit electronics and othercomponents from FIG. 12.

FIG. 15 shows another embodiment of a dock unit with earplugs.

FIG. 16 shows another embodiment of the earplug of the invention.

FIG. 17 shows a block diagram of a dosimeter system using the earplug ofFIG. 16.

FIG. 18 shows the earplugs from FIG. 16 along with two dock units.

FIG. 19 shows a cross-sectional view of another embodiment of an earplugand dock unit of the invention.

FIG. 20 shows a cross section of a passive dock unit in that itincorporates no active electronics.

FIG. 21 shows a schematic of an A-weighted filter with a compensationfilter that is a bridged-T filter.

FIG. 22 shows an embodiment of an in-ear dosimeter earplug of theinvention incorporating a proximity switch.

FIG. 23 shows an embodiment of the current invention with a separatedock unit for each earplug that can be worn on the shoulders for storingearplugs.

FIG. 24 shows the earplug electronics and other supporting components ofthe earplug embodiment from FIG. 22.

FIG. 25 shows an embodiment of equalization circuit from FIG. 24.

FIG. 26 shows the earplug embodiment from FIG. 22 in the dock unit fromFIG. 23.

FIG. 27 shows the earplug incorporating an additional temperature sensorfor sensing temperatures of the external ambient environment.

FIG. 28 shows in-ear dosimetry earplugs incorporating wireless links toremotely-located LEDs.

FIG. 29 shows a noise dosimetry system incorporating a noise dosimetryearplug, an earplug reader unit, a dock unit, remotely-locatedindicators and a computer.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The in-ear dosimetry system of the invention provides improvedfunctionality and performance and addresses the problems of wires, thedifference in occluded versus unoccluded ear responses, earplug storageand proper location of noise dose monitoring when the earplugs are notin the ears. The system also provides improved feedback to the userconcerning overexposure, and monitors the health of the worker bymonitoring body temperature, which is also used to determine if the useris wearing the earplugs.

Wires are eliminated using novel wireless techniques. Occluded earresponses are accounted for by using a novel electronic filter, so thatthe difference between occluded and unoccluded ear responses when theearplugs are worn and not worn is also addressed using novel electronicfilters and acoustic compensation devices. A novel storage device forthe earplugs creates a simple and sanitary storage solution that alsofunctions to locate the earplugs in the correct location for noisemonitoring when the earplugs are not worn.

The user does not need to remember to switch in electronic filteringusing the current invention to account for unoccluded and occluded earresponses. The transfer functions are automatically modified to theircorrect responses just by storing the earplugs in a dock unit or bymonitoring a temperature sensor that measures the temperature of theexternal ambient environment.

The dock unit is worn on the shoulder, in a preferred embodiment,providing the correct location for the noise dose measurement when theearplugs are not worn in the ear and the correct response is achieved atboth the shoulder and in-ear locations using novel techniques.

A preferred embodiment of the system can be seen in FIG. 4. Thisembodiment incorporates wireless in-ear dosimetry earplugs 16 and a dockunit 18. The dock unit 18 comprises an ambient microphone 20, avibration transducer 22 and associated dock unit electronics (notshown). These earplugs 16 can be worn effectively and comfortably underearmuffs, not shown, to achieve “double hearing protection.”

A cross section of an embodiment of the in-ear dosimetry earplugs 16 ofthe current invention can be seen in FIG. 5 a. The earplugs comprise anearplug shell 8, or body, that contains earplug components. An eartip 10is attached to the earplug shell 8 and has a sound delivery channel 12that acoustically couples sound at the proximal end (closest to theeardrum when worn in an ear) of the eartip 10 to an earplug microphone6.

When the earplug 16 is worn in an ear 11, similar to how the earplug inFIG. 2 is worn in an ear 11, the microphone 6 senses sound in a humanear canal 14. The microphone 6 communicates electrically with earplugelectronics 23, located within the earplug shell 8. A battery 24,preferably rechargeable, is used in this embodiment to provide power forthe earplug electronics 23 and microphone 6.

An earplug antenna 26 is used to communicate with a remote datacollection and processing system (not shown). This wire-free embodimenteliminates the problems previously mentioned regarding wires. Theearplug 16 in this embodiment is free of external electrical cables andconnectors. A top view of the earplug 16 from FIG. 5a can be seen inFIG. 5 b.

In this embodiment, when the earplugs 16 are removed from the ears, theycan be stored in or on a dock unit 18, as seen in FIG. 6. While theearplugs 16 are stored, they can continue to collect ambient noise data.The dock unit 18 has an ambient microphone 20 that can be used tocollect ambient noise data. When the earplugs 16 are worn in the ear,time-stamped data collected by the earplugs 16 can be compared totime-stamped data collected by the dock unit 18 to determine actualnoise attenuation provided by the earplugs 16. This information can beused to determine if a user wears his/her earplugs 16 properly. If thedata indicate that a user is not wearing the earplugs 16 to achieveproper attenuation, a supervisor may intervene and work with the user toimprove the earplug fit, preventing problems of hearing damage in thefuture.

A vibration transducer 22 in the dock unit can be used to providetactile feedback to the user, such as when maximum noise dosage has beenreached or if the earplugs 16 are not providing adequate protection, forexample. The dock unit 18 of the current invention can be used with bothwired and wireless iPNDs.

FIG. 7 shows a block diagram of an embodiment of the earplug electronics23 and other earplug components from FIGS. 4 through 6. A battery 24provides electrical power for earplug 16 components in this embodiment.

The earplug microphone 6 is connected to a microphone bias circuit 28which provides power to the microphone 6 and processes the microphoneaudio signal 30. The microphone bias circuit 28 is connected to anequalization circuit 32 which can provide filtering, such as A-weightedfiltering, known in the art and used in noise dosimeters. Aspecification for an A-weighted filter can be found in ANSI S1.42 DesignResponse of Weighting Networks for Acoustical Measurements, table 2.

The output of the equalization circuit 32 is processed, at least bysquaring and averaging, in a processing function which provides dataprocessing for calculation of the noise dose. In FIG. 7, this is shownas a squaring circuit 34 and averaging circuit 36. However, theprocessing function could also be performed by a root-mean-square (RMS)circuit as will be discussed below, which provides squaring andaveraging with the addition of taking the square root of the result.

In this embodiment, the noise dose is not calculated using earplugelectronics. The actual noise dose, which is a more complicatedcalculation, is calculated remotely in the dock unit 18 or other remotedevice. The noise dose calculation requires more electrical power, whichwould require a larger battery in an earplug.

The earplug processed signal 38, from the averaging circuit 36, is inputto a sensor port of an RFID chip 40. In this way, the processed signal38 from the microphone 6 can be sampled by the RFID chip 40.

A schematic of an RFID chip can be seen in FIG. 8 (prior art). This RFIDchip schematic was derived from the specification of a commerciallyavailable chip, the AMS SL13A RFID sensor tag and data logger ICmanufactured by the Austrian company ams AG, but it will be understoodthat this is for example only and other chips may be used within theteaching of the invention. The chip 40 can be powered using an externalbattery, but can also be powered using a coil and an external magneticfield. The chip 40 has an output voltage that can be used to powerexternal electrical components. The chip 40 may be controlled usingexternal digital logic through an SPI controller. The chip 40 also hasan external sensor input. Internally, the chip 40 has EEPROM programmemory, a data logging circuit for storing data with a time stampcreated by a time circuit, an analog to digital converter (A/D) withsampling capability, an internal processor and the ability to use a coilfor wireless communications, among other functions. A temperature sensoris also built into this chip. The internal processor of the RFID chip 40can be used for calculating noise dosage.

The RFID chip 40 in the earplug 16 can communicate with an RFIDtransceiver remotely located using an earplug antenna 42. The earplugantenna 42 from FIG. 7, in this embodiment, is the coil from FIG. 8(prior art).

While the term “RFID chip” and “RFID transceiver” is used herein, itwill be understood that this term is intended to mean a radio-frequencytransmitter or transceiver circuit capable of transmitting the data fromthe earplug to the remote circuit or dock described below. It is notintended to limit the invention to specific chips intended solely forRFID purposes.

The noise dose can thus be determined remotely using an integrator andcalculations described in ANSI S1.25 (Specification for NoiseDosimeters), for example. This has significant benefits because thenoise dose calculation requires additional electrical power. This novelprocess of splitting the noise dose calculation into two separatedcalculations in two separate physical systems, one done in the earplugand one outside of the earplug, enables the use of a smaller battery inthe earplug, which means a smaller, better-fitting and more comfortableearplug can be employed in this embodiment. This is important becauseearplugs need to be very small so they can fit comfortably in the ear.

In this embodiment, the filtered, squared and averaged earplugmicrophone data are exported to another device that calculates the noisedose using an integrator. The earplug processing may also contain asquare root circuit so that filtered root mean squared data areexported. The external device can be a smart phone or other handhelddevice that can be used to spot check the user's noise dose. The deviceonly needs to be held in the vicinity of the earplug in question. Thedata are then downloaded and the noise dose is calculated in the remotedevice. In other embodiments of the invention, the RFID chip or aseparate chip within the earplug 16 calculates the noise dose.

There are some electronic chips, such as “all-in-one” digital audioprocessing chips, that can provide the microphone bias, equalization,squaring and averaging functions in one single chip if programmedproperly. An earplug microphone may be connected directly to an“all-in-one” audio chip and its output, in digital or analog form, maybe directly connected to an RFID chip. However, these “all-in-one” chipstypically require more electrical power compared to analog solutions andtypically require a larger battery.

A cross section of the embodiment of a dock unit 18 from FIG. 4 of thecurrent invention is shown in FIG. 9. The dock unit has several novelfeatures. The dock unit has recesses 44 that the earplugs 16 can fitinto for storage. To secure the earplugs 16 in place in this embodiment,dock magnets 46 are used to create a retention force due to attractionto components in the earplugs 16, such as the earplug battery 24. Thedock unit 18 has switches 48 that are activated when the earplugs 16 arestored in the dock unit 18.

The dock unit 18 in this embodiment includes a spring 50 and clothesclip 52 that can be used to attach the dock unit 18 to the user'sclothing, preferably at the shoulder location. Another convenientlocation to clip the dock unit 18 would be to a shirt pocket. An ambientmicrophone 20 mounted to the dock unit 18 is used to monitor ambientsound. A vibration transducer 22 in the dock unit 18 can be used toalert the user of events such as reaching maximum noise dose.

The switches 48, ambient microphone 20 and vibration transducer 22communicate with dock unit electronics 54. A battery 56 provides powerfor dock unit electronics 54.

Dock unit transceiver antennas 58 are used to communicate with thetransceiver antennas 42 of each earplug 16. Magnetic fields are used inthis embodiment for wireless communications.

Processed earplug microphone data may be communicated to dock unitelectronics 54 for further processing. For example, the earplugmicrophone signal 38 that has been equalized, squared and averaged maybe downloaded to the dock unit 18 where these data are used to calculatenoise dosage using an integrator and other processors. The wirelessmagnetic communication between the dock unit transceiver antennas 58 andearplugs 16 may also be used to recharge the earplug batteries 24.

A dock unit 18 may be used for each earplug 16 and worn on eachshoulder. The dock unit 18 may also be attached to items such as hardhats. LED lights may be used on the dock unit 18 to indicate when theearplugs 16 are docked and not docked. This would be useful for asupervisor in quickly determining if the earplugs 16 are being worn, asa red LED is easily seen at a distance.

FIG. 10 is a block diagram of the dock unit 18 electronics 54 and otherdock unit 18 components. The ambient microphone 20 constantly monitorsthe noise level at the dock unit location, on the user's shoulder in thepreferred embodiment. A microphone bias circuit 60 provides power andfiltering to the ambient microphone output signal, and the microphonebias signal is input to a digital signal processor (DSP) 61, in thispreferred embodiment. The DSP 61 calculates the noise dose at theambient microphone 20 location. Data may be stored in a memory chip 62.The DSP 61 can communicate to other devices, including the earplugs 16,using an RFID chip 64 and dock unit transceiver antenna 58.

At least one switch 48, in this embodiment, is used to detect when anearplug 16 is stored in the dock unit 18. This information is importantbecause the dock unit 18 can time stamp when the user's ear isunprotected. A switch 48 for each earplug 16 is preferred. The dock unitelectronics 54 can communicate with a vibration transducer 22 to alertthe user of various problems, such as high noise dose. The filtered,squared and averaged data are downloaded from the earplugs 16 using thedock unit transceiver antennas 58. An integrator 66 is used to calculatethe noise dose from each earplug 16. The integrator 66 may beincorporated within the DSP 61 or may be a separate circuit.

FIG. 11 shows an in-ear dosimetry system employing a neckloop 70 as atransceiver antenna. The neckloop 70 consists of at least one turn ofelectrical wire. A dock unit 72 in this embodiment communicates with theearplugs 16, wirelessly, using the neckloop 70 by generating magneticfields. (The figure shows magnetic fields for only one of two channelsto improve clarity.) The dock unit 72 is clipped to the clothing of theuser, in this embodiment, so that the dock unit 72 rests on theshoulder. The neckloop 70 may also be worn like a necklace with the dockunit 72 hanging against the chest or other locations in otherembodiments.

The cross section of an earplug 16 and dock unit 18 for this embodimentcan be seen in FIG. 12. Note that only one earplug 16 is shown, forclarity, but a second earplug can be stored in the dock unit 18 in asimilar way. In this embodiment, the earplug 16 is stored with themajority of the eartip 10 housed within cavity 74 in the dock unit 18.The cavity 74 is acoustically coupled to the acoustic noise environmentthrough an acoustic port 76 and an acoustic network 78 that may consistof tubes, chambers, screens and other acoustical elements.

In this embodiment, when the earplug 16 is stored in the dock unit 18,the earplug microphone 6 is acoustically coupled to the acoustic noiseenvironment. The acoustical network 78 can be used to tailor theresponse of the earplug microphone 6 output when docked to compensatefor a change in acoustic response in the dock unit 18 compared to theacoustic response in an ear canal 14.

The dock unit 18 of the preferred embodiment provides a hygienic placeto store the earplugs 16, instead of a pants pocket, for example thatcould soil an eartip 10. The eartip 10 remains clean when stored in thedock units 18, and the earplugs 16 are easily accessible. Moreover, theeartips 10 are out of view, so that co-workers do not see the ear waxdeposits of another co-worker, and this creates an aestheticallypleasing situation and prevents embarrassment.

In this embodiment, a proximity switch 79 is incorporated into theearplug 16 and switches state when in the presence of the magnetic fieldfrom dock magnet 46. The dock magnet 46 holds the earplug 16 in the dockunit 18. In this way, when the earplug 16 is stored in the dock unit 18the earplug electronics 23 can be alerted by the proximity switch 79. Inthis way, a time stamp may be used, within the earplug electronics 23,to keep track of when the earplug 16 is stored in the dock unit 18. Thisindicates an unprotected ear.

A neckloop connector 80 serves to connect the neckloop 70 to the dockunit 18 electronics 54. If the neckloop 70 were to catch on an object,the connector 80 would release as a safety precaution. If the dock unit18 becomes unclipped from the user's clothing, the neckloop 70 willprevent the dock unit 18 from falling to the floor. The dock unit 18 mayalso incorporate a transceiver antenna 58 that can be used tocommunicate with the earplugs 16 for battery charging purposes, forexample, and may also include an ambient microphone 20 as was explainedin other embodiments, above.

FIG. 13 shows a block diagram of the earplug 16 electronics 23 and othercomponents from FIG. 11. This block diagram includes the proximityswitch 79 from FIG. 12. No battery is used in this embodiment becauseelectrical power is provided wirelessly using an earplug antenna 42. Inthis embodiment, a square root circuit 82 is incorporated in the signalpath between averaging circuit 36 and the sensor input of the RFID chip40. The square root function 82 may be incorporated in the earplugelectronics 23 or the dock unit electronics 54 and is used incalculating the noise dose. The RFID chip 40 incorporates an analog todigital converter, but a separate dedicated converter may be employed.

FIG. 14 shows a block diagram of the dock unit 18 electronics 54 andother components from FIG. 12. This embodiment shows components shown inFIG. 10, as well as new components. A neckloop 70 is now used as thedock unit transceiver antenna. Magnetic fields produced by the neckloop70 provide communications with the earplug 16 transceiver antenna 42 andearplug RFID chip 40 and provide wireless power for the earplug 16electronics 23. In this embodiment, the output from the square rootcircuit 82 is digitized by the RFID chip 40, and this data is sent tothe dock unit 18 using the earplug transceiver antenna 42 and docktransceiver antenna 70. The RFID chip 64 in the dock unit 18 receivesthe data and sends this to the dock unit DSP 61 where the noise exposureis calculated using equation 1 from ANSI S1.25-1991:

${D(Q)} = {\frac{100}{Tc}{\int_{0}^{T}{10^{{\lbrack{({L - {Lc}})}\rbrack}/q}{dt}}}}$

Where:

D(Q)=percentage criterion exposure for exchange rate Q;

Tc=criterion sound duration=8 hours

T=measurement duration in hours;

t=time in hours;

L=SLOW (or FAST) A-weighted sound level, a function of time, when thesound level is greater than or equal to L, or equals −infinity when theA-weighted sound level is less than Lt;

Lt=threshold sound level specified by the manufacturer;

Lc=criterion sound level specified by the manufacturer;

Q=exchange rate in decibels; and

q=10 for a 3 dB exchange rate.

The noise exposure may also be calculated within the earplug 16, inanother embodiment, using the capabilities of the RFID chip 40 processoror other processor chip located within the earplug 16.

FIG. 15 shows another embodiment of the invention depicting a dock unit18 with earplugs 16. In this embodiment, dock magnets 46 and earplugmagnets 84 are used that are of opposite polarity. The earplugs 16 a and16 b use magnets 84 a and 84 b that are reversed polarity from eachother. In this way, if, for example, earplug 16 a is placed in thecorrect dock unit recess 44 a, opposite polarities of the earplug magnet84 a and dock unit magnet 46 a will attract, and the earplug 16 a willremain secured. If an earplug 16 a is placed in the incorrect recess 44b, the earplug 16 a will not attach to the dock unit 18 because themagnets 84 a in the earplug 16 a and magnet 46 b in the dock unit 18will provide a repelling force.

Used in conjunction with dock unit switches 48, the dock unit 18 willknow which earplugs 16 a and 16 b have been stored and which are notprotecting the user's ear. The earplugs 16 a and 16 b are preferablycolor-coded or differentiated from each other in another way, forinstance red for the right earplug 16 b and blue for the left earplug 16a, so that the user uses a specific earplug in a specific ear at alltimes. In this way the dock unit 18 will know which ear is unprotected,and this information can be stored using the dock unit electronics 54.

FIG. 16 shows another embodiment of the earplug 16 of the invention.This embodiment is similar to the embodiment shown in FIG. 5 a, butincludes an earplug ambient microphone 86. The earplug ambientmicrophone 86 is acoustically coupled to the acoustic noise environmentand electrically connected to the earplug electronics 23. Thismicrophone 86 senses the unprotected noise level of the user.

An earplug canal microphone 6 is used to monitor the acoustic noiselevels in the ear canal 14 when the earplug 16 is inserted in the ear11. Comparing the data for the two microphones 6 and 86 can indicate theacoustic noise attenuation provided by the earplug 16 when worn in theear. If the two microphones 6 and 86 indicate similar levels, thisindicates that the earplug is not being worn in the ear canal.

If an additional speaker 13 is used within the earplug 16, atalk-through feature can be incorporated where the ambient microphone 86signal is coupled to the speaker 13 and the speaker 13 is coupled to theear canal 14 through a sound delivery channel 12. The ear canalmicrophone 6 would still be used for measuring noise dose exposure whichwould include sound levels generated by the speaker 13.

In this embodiment, as shown in FIG. 17, data from both microphones 6and 86 are processed independently in a similar way to that shown inFIG. 7. Using two microphones 6 and 86 in the earplug 16 in thisembodiment allows for useful information when noise dose levels arecollected. The microphone signals are each processed by a microphonebias circuit 28, equalization circuit 32, squaring circuit 34 andaveraging circuit 36, as discussed above with reference to FIG. 7. Theearplug processed signal from both of the averaging circuits 36, isinput to an RFID chip 40. An RMS circuit may also be used. These dataare exported wirelessly for further processing using magnetic inductionand an earplug antenna 42.

The earplugs 16 a and 16 b from FIG. 16 are shown in FIG. 18 along withtwo dock units 18 a and 18 b, secured to the user at the shoulderlocation using a clothes clip or other retaining device. In thisembodiment, the dock units 18 a and 18 b are passive systems, to reducecost. That is, there are no electronics in the dock units 18 a and 18 bin this embodiment. In the figure, the left earplug 16 a is worn in theuser's ear while the right earplug 16 b is being stored in a dock unit18 b. Such a scenario might exist if the worker is having face-to-facecommunications with a co-worker and the worker uses one ear to hearcommunications while the other ear remains protected. However, bothearplugs 16 a and 16 b may be worn in the ear, and both 16 a and 16 bmay be stored in their respective dock units 18 a and 18 b, as desired.

The dock units 18 a and 18 b have an internal acoustic network similarto the one shown in FIG. 12 with an acoustic port 76, in thisembodiment. In this way, the earplug microphones 6 monitor the noiselevels at the left and right shoulder locations. Because the earplugmicrophones 6 monitor the unprotected noise levels at each shoulderlocation, compared to a single location, this configuration is moreaccurate compared to a single dock at a single shoulder location becauseeach dock is closer to its respective ear, and the acoustic headshadowing problem, known in the art, is mitigated.

In another embodiment of the invention, one dock unit 18 is shown inFIG. 19 in a cross-sectional view. The dock unit 18 has at least onedock unit transceiver antenna 58 in the form of coils that cancommunicate with each earplug 16. In FIG. 19, the dock unit transceiverantenna 58 in this embodiment has three turns and is shown in crosssection. However, coils of more or less turns may also be incorporated.

Each dock unit 18 is relatively close, within ten inches, to itsrespective earplug when the earplugs 16 are worn in the ear and the dockunits 18 are preferably worn on the shoulder. Thus, a low powerelectromagnetic signal can be used for communications between the dockunit 18 and earplugs 16, and this will require less power compared toclipping the dock unit 18 to a pants pocket, for example. The earplugs16 can incorporate batteries, or as shown in FIG. 19, they can bebattery-free and harvest power generated by dock unit transceiverantennas 58 in the dock units 18.

The dock unit 18 in this embodiment would have an overall shape like ahockey puck, but smaller in size, where the dock unit transceiverantenna coil 58 is located at the outer perimeter of the dock unit 18for maximum transceiver antenna loop radius. Other dock unit geometrieswould also work, such as rectangular. A magnet 46 holds the earplug tothe dock unit 18. The earplug microphone 6 is acoustically coupled tothe ambient noise environment through an acoustic port 76.

Another embodiment of the invention is shown in FIG. 20. The figuredepicts a cross section of a passive dock unit 18 which incorporates noactive electronics. Details, such as a clothes clip for attaching thedock unit to clothes, are not included in the drawing for clarity. Whenthe eartip 10 of the earplug 16 is inserted into the dock unit 18, theeartip 10 creates a least a partial acoustical seal with the dock unit18 and an acoustic path is created from an acoustic port 76 on the dockunit 18 to the earplug microphone 6.

The dock unit 18 incorporates an acoustic compensator 93 that includesan acoustic port 76, a dock unit channel 94 and an acoustic damper 92 inthis embodiment. The acoustic compensator 93 is acoustically coupled tothe ambient acoustic noise environment through the acoustic port 76, andacoustically coupled to the earplug microphone 6 through the earplugsound delivery channel 12 and dock unit channel 94. Therefore, anacoustic path is created from the acoustic noise environment, throughthe dock unit 18, to the earplug microphone 6. The acoustic compensator93 modifies the acoustic transfer function from the acoustic noiseenvironment to the earplug microphone 6 by incorporating at least oneacoustical element, such as a port, tube, damper, Helmholtz resonator,volume chamber, vent or other acoustical element.

The additional length of the acoustic path due to the dock unit channel94 combined with the sound delivery channel 12 of the earplug to themicrophone 6 creates a boosting of the frequency response at themicrophone 6 between 2,000 Hz and 5,000 Hz to simulate the resonance andboosting of sound in an average unoccluded human ear. In a preferredembodiment, the acoustic compensator 93 amplifies the pressure at theearplug microphone 6 by at least 3 dB in the 2,000 Hz to 5,000 Hzregion, compared to pressure sensed by the earplug microphone 6 when theearplug 16 is not in the dock unit 18. This amplification is consideredto be significant.

An acoustic damper 90 in the dock unit 18 dampens this acousticresonance, in this embodiment. The acoustic damper 90 is chosen so thatthe boost in earplug microphone response is at least 9 dB SPL but notgreater than 18 dB compared to if the earplug microphone 6 were outsideof the earplug and suspended with a string. A boost of between 11 dB and16 dB at 2,500 Hz is desirable in this embodiment and mimics theresponse of a head-and-torso simulator (HATS) when subjected to adiffuse field.

An example of an HATS can be found in ITU-T P.58 specification: Head andTorso Simulator For Telephonometry. Another specification for an HATS isthe ANSI S3.36 Specification for a Manikin for Simulated in-situAirborne Acoustic Measurements, where Table III is relevant. Theresponse of an HATS when subjected to a diffuse field, from the freefield to the HATS eardrum microphone is the desired response from theacoustic noise environment to the earplug microphone in this embodiment.A suitable free-field response can be found in ITU-T P.58, table 3/P.58Sound Pick-up Diffuse Field Frequency Response of HATS.

That is, it is desirable for the docked earplug acoustic response tomimic the free field response of an HATS. A 2,000 Hz to 5,000 Hz rangefor the boosting corresponds to boosting seen in table 3/P.58 ofITU-TP.58, while a boost level of between 9 dB and 18 dB falls withinthe boosting levels seen in table 3/P.58 of ITU-TP.58 for this frequencyrange. The free field response of a HATS specification may also be usedinstead of the diffuse field response in designing the dock unitacoustics.

When the earplug is placed in the dock unit, the combination of acousticresponse of the earplug sound delivery channel 12 with the acousticresponse of the dock unit 18 creates an acoustic response at the earplugmicrophone 6 that is similar to the response of a human eardrum todiffuse sounds outside of the ear. Helmholtz resonators, acousticdampers and other acoustic elements and acoustical branches in the dockunit can also be used to shape the acoustic response, similar to anIEC711 canal simulator or Zwislocki coupler, so that when the earplug isdocked the response from the acoustic noise environment to the earplugmicrophone simulate that of a human's ear.

One possible location in this embodiment for a side branch 95 isindicated in FIG. 20. This branch 95 could be a damped Helmhotzresonator, for example. This embodiment assumes that when the earplug isin a human ear, the earplug microphone pressure is a reasonably accuraterepresentation of the eardrum pressure. An earplug acoustic damper 90placed within the earplug 16 helps to achieve this by damping resonancesof the earplug-canal acoustics.

In this embodiment, the earplug electronics 23 shown in FIG. 7 areincorporated in the earplug 16, where the equalization circuit 32 inthis embodiment is shaped such that when the earplug 16 is stored in thedock unit 18 in FIG. 20, the combined response of the docked earplugacoustic response cascaded with the response of the equalization circuit32 creates an A-weighted filter shape.

That is, when the earplug 16 is placed in the dock unit 18 and subjectedto a diffuse white noise acoustic field, the power spectrum measured atthe output of the equalization filter 32 will have the A-weightedresponse shape. In this way, when the earplug 16 is stored in the dockunit 18, and the dock unit 18 is hung by a string and placed in adiffuse acoustic field, the output from the equalization circuit 32 ofthe current invention will produce a similar or same output compared tothe output of the A-weighted filter of a typical noise dosimeter withoverall gain selected to be suitable for the specific circuits used.

When the earplug 16 is removed from the dock unit 18 and placed in ahuman ear 11, the acoustic response to the earplug microphone 6 willchange due to the acoustics of the earplug sound channel 12 beingcoupled to an ear canal 14 instead of the dock unit acoustical circuit93, but the equalization circuit 32 response will remain the same. Inthis embodiment of the invention seen in FIG. 20, an earplug acousticdamper 90 is used to dampen the resonance of the earplug sound deliverychannel 12. This damper 90 controls unwanted sound amplification due toresonance.

When the earplug 16 is worn in an ear 11, the sound pressure at theearplug microphone 6 is similar to the sound pressure at the eardrum 15,except for the acoustic response due to the occluded ear canal and sounddelivery channel 12. In this way, when the earplug 16 is stored in thedock unit 18 on the shoulder of a user, the response is very similar tothe response of a typical noise dosimeter worn on the shoulder and willgive accurate noise dose measurements.

When the earplug 16 is worn in the ear 11, the response will change andthe measurement will de-emphasize the response in the 2,000 Hz to 5,000Hz by at least 3 dB. This is desirable because noise dose measurementstaken in the occluded ear canal should compensate for the change inacoustics in this way for more accurate noise dose measurements. Thisresults in a more accurate noise dose measurement for in-ear noisedosimeters that are used to determine both the noise dose in the ear aswell as outside the ear.

One way to create a simple version of this novel equalization circuit32, as shown in the embodiment of FIG. 21, is to cascade an A-weightedfilter 96 with a compensation filter 97 that is a bridged-T filter. Thiswill approximate the desired response. An electronic signal flows fromthe input to the A-weighted filter 96 and then to a bridged-Tcompensation filter 97. The bridged-T filter 97 comprises four elementsin this embodiment: resistors R1 and R2 and capacitors C1 and C2.

The bridged-T filter 97 may also be implemented by including inductorsand other components in the circuit. The values of R1, R2, C1 and C2 arechosen to create a notch in the 2,000 Hz to 5,000 Hz range with a dip ofbetween 9 dB and 18 dB in this embodiment, dependent on the acousticresponse achieved with the earplug 16 in the dock unit 18. Morecomplicated versions of the bridged-T circuit 97 incorporatingadditional components and active amplifiers can be used for higheraccuracy.

Additionally, the bridged-T filter can be integrated within theA-weighted filter 96 to create a single filter with fewer components.Values of R1=9,000 Ohm, R2=2,000 Ohm, C1=6 nF and C2=30 nF provide a dipin response of 14 dB at approximately 2,500 kHz, which is within therange of 11 dB to 16 dB at 2,500 Hz.

To the extent that when the earplug 16 is in the ear canal 14 and dampedresonances affect the frequency response from the eardrum 15 to theearplug microphone 6, these effects can be compensated for with theacoustical design of the dock unit 18 and earplug equalization circuit32.

In a preferred embodiment, the earplug equalization circuit 32 modifiesthe microphone 6 signal such that when the earplug 16 is in the dockunit 18 and the dock unit 18 is suspended by a string in a diffuse soundfield, the power spectrum output of the equalization circuit 32 comparedto the power spectrum of the diffuse sound field pressure exhibits anA-weighted curve shape. In the presence of ambient acoustic noise andthe earplug 16 is in an ear 11, the output of the power spectrum of theequalization circuit 32 compared to the power spectrum of the pressureat the eardrum 15 exhibits a response curve that equals the inverse ofthe diffuse field response of an un-occluded ear compensated by theacoustic response of the occluded ear canal with earplug.

For example, the diffuse field response of the human ear adds 14 dBboosting to the acoustic spectrum at 2,500 Hz. If the pressure at thehuman ear canal is 3 dB higher when wearing the earplug compared to thepressure at the earplug microphone, 3 dB is subtracted from 14 dB toyield an earplug filter circuit response of −11 dB, instead of −14 dBfor the proper design in this embodiment. This compensation technique isused at all frequencies in the preferred embodiment.

Whatever the compensation needs to be, the earplug equalization circuit32 modifies the microphone signal 6 such that when the earplug 16 is inthe dock unit 18 and the dock unit 18 is suspended by a string in adiffuse sound field, the power spectrum output of the equalizationcircuit 32 compared to the power spectrum of the diffuse sound fieldpressure exhibits an A-weighted curve shape. If a dock unit 18 is notused, the earplug equalization circuit 32 modifies the microphone 6signal such that when the earplug 16 is suspended by a string in adiffuse sound field, the power spectrum output of the equalizationcircuit 32 compared to the power spectrum of the diffuse sound fieldpressure exhibits an A-weighted curve shape. The dock acoustics mustalso be modified, compared to a dock 18 unit that mimics the human eardiffuse field response, to account for occluded ear damped resonances tomaintain an A-weighted response.

If the occluded ear response from eardrum 15 to earplug microphone 6 isnot appreciably flat, due to a given earplug acoustic design, thedesigner can begin the design process by determining the proper earplugequalization circuit 32 response first. In this embodiment, the properequalization filter 32 characteristics would be equivalent to thediffuse field unoccluded ear response compensated by the occluded earresponse. This is equal to H_(eq)=−(P_(uec)/Pa−P_(oec)/P_(m)), whereP_(uec) equals the unoccluded spectrum, P_(a) is the diffuse ambientfield spectrum, P_(oec) is the occluded spectrum at the ear canal, P_(m)is the occluded spectrum at the earplug microphone and H_(eq) is thefrequency response of the compensation filter 97, when a diffuse ambientsound field is used as a source. The transfer functions are in units ofdB.

Once the H_(eq) transfer function has been determined, it is combinedwith an A-weighted filter 96 to form the earplug equalization circuit 32filter.

Then, the dock acoustical design must be determined. Acousticalelements, such as tubes, cavities and dampers are used to couple to theearplug sound delivery channel so that the output spectrum of theearplug equalization filter has the shape of an A-weighted filter whenthe earplug is in the dock unit, and the dock unit suspended by a stringand placed in a diffuse sound field. Mathematically, this means thatH_(a)=P_(eq)/P_(a), where H_(a) is the frequency response of anA-weighted filter and P_(eq) is the spectrum at the output of theearplug equalization circuit due to a diffuse ambient pressure field ofspectrum Pa.

Also, H_(a)=P_(m)/P_(a)+H_(eq)+H_(eqm), where H_(eqm) is the response ofa microphone electronic filter that compensates for a microphone withnon-flat inherent response to achieve a flat microphone response whenthe microphone is outside the earplug and suspended in free space.

In another embodiment of the invention, one can take acousticmeasurements of the earplug microphone 6 in the dock unit 18, when wornon the shoulder of a HATS, to a diffuse field, and compare this resultwith the HATS ear canal microphone. The designer modifies the length ofthe dock unit channel 94 and tunes any side branches 95 in the dock unit18 to achieve the HATS response.

Once this acoustic design has been determined, the dock unit 18 withearplug 16 is suspended by a string and subjected to a diffuse acousticfield. The response of the earplug equalization circuit 32 is thendesigned and modified to produce an A-weighted response when comparingthe diffuse field pressure, measured with a microphone with flat diffusefield response, to the equalization circuit 32 output. This techniqueworks well when the microphone to eardrum transfer function isrelatively flat when the earplug 16 is worn in the ear 11.

In another embodiment of the invention, an acoustic response from theambient environment to the earplug microphone 6 location when in thedock unit 18 and suspended by a string in the field is given by H_(dua).The acoustic response from the ambient environment to an unoccludedhuman eardrum 15 (ratio of eardrum pressure over ambient pressure) isgiven by H_(ua). The average acoustic response of the earplug microphone6 to a human eardrum 15 (ratio of pressure at the eardrum 15 overpressure at the earplug microphone 6) when the earplug 16 is worn in theear (occluded ear) and subjected to ambient noise is given by H_(om).

The relationship between these transfer functions in the preferredembodiment is H_(dua)=H_(ua)−H_(om), where the transfer functions aremagnitudes and expressed in decibels. H_(dua) is the target acousticresponse of the earplug 16 in the dock unit 18. The designer usesacoustic elements, such as tubing, volumes, Helmhotz resonators, dampersand other acoustic elements to achieve this transfer function.

The magnitude response of H_(dua) is determined by using the magnitudeof the acoustic response of the human ear or suitable HATS, taken at theeardrum or simulated eardrum, subject to ambient noise. This is providedin specifications such as ITU-T P.58 or ANSI S3.36. The transferfunction from input to output of an earplug compensation filter 97 isgiven by H_(cf); H_(ef) is the transfer function of an equalizationcircuit 32; and H_(af) is the transfer function of an A-Weighted filter96. Then H_(ef)=H_(af)+H_(cf), where H_(cf)=−H_(dua).

In this way, when the earplug 16 is suspended on a string and subject toambient acoustic noise, the transfer function from the ambient noise tothe output of the earplug equalization circuit 32 will look like anA-weighted filter, with appropriate scaling gain for processing theelectrical signal to determine the noise dose. When the earplug 16 isworn by a user, the earplug equalization circuit 97 compensates for theunoccluded and occluded ear responses. When the earplug is placed in thedock unit 18, the dock unit acoustical elements serve to alter theacoustic response from the ambient acoustic environment to the earplugmicrophone 6 to compensate for the change in acoustical response of anearplug 16 in free space compared to in a human ear. The earplugcompensation filter 97 has the same shape, but inverted and withappropriate overall gain, as the acoustic response of the earplug 16 inthe dock unit 18.

The sum of the transfer functions H_(dua)+H_(om) should preferably havea gain of between 9 dB and 18 dB, and at least 3 dB, at at least onefrequency between 2,000 Hz and 5,000 Hz, when suspended from a string ina diffuse acoustic field in a preferred embodiment, based on ITU-T P.58,table 3/P.58 Sound Pick-up Diffuse Field Frequency Response of HATS. Thesum of the transfer functions H_(dua)+H_(om) should have a gain ofbetween 11 dB and 16 dB, and at least 3 dB, at the third octavefrequency of 2,500 Hz when the dock unit 18 is suspended from a stringin a diffuse field, in another embodiment, based on ITU-T P.58, table3/P.58 Sound Pick-up Diffuse Field Frequency Response of HATS. A gain ofat least 3 dB is considered a significant change in noise dosimetry asdescribed earlier.

FIG. 22 shows an embodiment of an earplug 16 of the inventionincorporating a switch 98. In the preferred embodiment, the switch 98 isa proximity switch and is sensitive to magnetic fields and is activatedin the presence of a magnet in the dock unit 18. However, mechanicalproximity switches could also be used that are activated when theearplug is placed in a dock unit 18. The earplug electronics 23 arepowered using an electrical power source. In this embodiment, theelectrical power source is a battery 24. However, other electrical powersources could be used, such as a charged capacitor or other device knownin the art of electronics design. An earplug antenna 42 is used tocommunicate data collected in the earplug to a data processor remotelylocated (not shown). The earplug shell 8 of the earplug, in thisembodiment, incorporates a microphone 6 as a sensor for measuring soundacoustically coupled from the ambient noise environment through a sounddelivery channel 12. This embodiment also incorporates and eartip 10 foracoustically sealing the ear canal 14 to provide hearing protection fromambient noise.

In a preferred embodiment of the invention, shown in FIG. 23, each leftand right earplug 16 a and 16 b can be stored in its own dock unit 18 aand 18 b. In this preferred embodiment, the dock units 18 a and 18 b aresmall and can be clipped to the user's clothing at the preferredlocation on the shoulder. This can be achieved by using a clothes clipattached to each dock 18 a and 18 b which clips to the collar of ashirt, as shown in FIG. 23. The shoulder location is preferred becausethat location is close to the ear of the user. With two dock units 18 aand 18 b, each earplug 16 a and 16 b can be located close to itscorresponding ear. In FIG. 23, only one of the earplugs, the leftearplug 16 a, is docked in dock 18 a. The user may want to dock only oneearplug 16 a when engaged in face-to-face communications with aco-worker. When docked on the left shoulder, the left earplug 16 amicrophone 6 measures the noise levels close to the left ear. In typicalnoise dosimeters, one microphone is used at the shoulder location.However, this is less accurate for measuring the unprotected exposure ofboth ears compared to using locations on each shoulder near each earwhich can be achieved with the invention.

FIG. 24 shows the preferred embodiment of the earplug electronics 23 andother supporting components of the earplug 16. The earplug electronics23 are similar to those shown in FIG. 13, except that a battery 24 isused as a power source instead of harvesting a magnetic field using theearplug antenna 42. Moreover, a different equalization circuit 32 isused and the proximity switch 98 communicates with the RFID chip 40.Similar to the embodiment shown in FIG. 13, the proximity switch 98 alsocommunicates with the equalization circuit 32.

A description of squaring and averaging, in particular, exponentialaveraging, a signal for noise dosimetry can be found in ANSI S1.25(Specification for Noise Dosimeters), FIG. 1 and supporting textthroughout the document. The squaring, averaging and square rootcircuits can be incorporated into a single chip, called an RMS detector31, shown in FIG. 24. An example of this would be using the LinearTechnology LTC1967 chip, with supporting capacitors and resistorsnecessary for proper operation, as seen in the LTC1967 specification. Inparticular, an averaging capacitor is required at the chip output. Thisexample of an RMS circuit uses a sigma-delta converter, but other typesof RMS converters are available and known in the art. Digital signalprocessors (DSPs) can also be used to create squaring-averaging circuitsand RMS circuits.

Some squaring-averaging circuits do not directly calculate the square ofa signal and then average the signal, but effectively provide thesquaring and averaging function. One example would be a circuit thatmeasures the temperature of a resistor due to a signal applied acrossits terminals. A positive heat measurement is recorded even if thesignal across the resistor is alternating between positive and negativepotential because power is dissipated in the resistor regardless ofsignal polarity. Averaging is achieved because of the thermal mass ofthe resistor. The measured temperature of the resistor can be used todetermine the average squared input signal to the resistor but thistechnique does not require a circuit that specifically calculates thesquare of a signal, but effectively it can provide the squared signalaverage value if proper scaling of the result is used.

Exponential averaging the squared signal in noise dosimeters can yield aslowly varying electronic signal, below the audio spectrum that can besampled at much slower sampling rates compared to sampling the squaredsignal, itself, or other signals in the audio spectrum. The audiospectrum is considered to be between 20 Hz and 20,000 Hz.

To properly sample a time-varying signal, the sampling rate must begreater than double the highest frequency of the signal. For an audiosignal, this would be sampling at least 40,000 times per second. Signalshaving a spectrum below the audio spectrum can be sampled at frequenciesof less than 40 (2×20) times per second.

The exponentially averaged squared signal, or RMS signal, used for anoise dose calculation can be sampled at rates of less than 40 times persecond, and even once per second in some applications. Sampling thesquared and exponentially averaged, or RMS, audio signal can result in39,960 fewer samples per second in the invention due to the noveltechnique of sampling the averaged squared signal, or RMS signal, withinthe earplug instead of the audio spectrum signal derived from themicrophone, which results in significant power savings.

This is critical because minimizing the battery size results in a morecomfortable earplug. Moreover, in another embodiment of the invention,this reduction of power of the invention enables the operation of theearplug using wireless power transfer because of the limited capacity ofwireless power systems using small earplug antennas.

FIG. 25 shows details of the equalization circuit 32 shown in theembodiment of FIG. 24. This equalization circuit 32 is similar to thecircuit shown in FIG. 21, except that the location of a proximity switch98 is shown for this embodiment. The proximity switch 98 is activatedwhen the earplug is placed in a magnetic field, for example, near amagnet in a dock unit 18. In this way, two equalization circuitresponses are achieved depending on the state of the switch, and thestate of the switch depends on whether the earplug 16 is in the dock 18or not in the dock 18. The equalization circuits 32 can be analog, asshown in FIG. 25, or can be digital. In a preferred embodiment, there isat least a 3 dB difference in the response of the two filters at atleast one frequency between 2 kHz and 5 kHz.

A single dock unit 18 from FIG. 23 is shown in FIG. 26. In thisembodiment of the invention, the dock unit 18 is passive, in that itdoes not require electrical power to function and can therefore be madevery inexpensively, small in size and doesn't require a battery. Theinterior of the earplug 16 is not shown in FIG. 26 for simplicity andclarity. This dock unit 18 incorporates a magnet 46 to hold the earplug16 in place, due to magnetic attraction to a battery in the earplug (notshown), and to activate the proximity switch 98 within the earplug 16.

In the preferred embodiment, the proximity 98 switch modifies thecompensation filter 97 frequency response. The proximity switch 98 is inthe open circuit state when activated in this embodiment. This occurswhen the earplug is in the dock unit, and the compensation filter 97functions to filter the output of the A-weight filter 96. When theearplug 16 is removed from the dock 18, the proximity switch 98 is nolonger in a magnetic field and the switch 98 is deactivated and in theshort circuit state, and the compensation filter 97 is bypassed in theequalization circuit 32. In this way, the earplug 16 can have twoequalization settings: one when the earplug 16 is in a dock 18 andanother when it isn't, such as when it is in the ear.

In this embodiment, the proximity switch 98 also communicates with theRFID chip 40 to communicate to the RFID chip 40 that the earplug 16 isin the presence of a magnetic field, such as when it is docked. The RFIDchip 40 can time stamp this data to indicate when the earplug 16 is inthe dock 18 and when it isn't. The RFID chip 40 also time stamps thedigitized output of the square root circuit 82.

In this preferred embodiment, when the earplug is suspended from astring, with no rigid structures in close proximity that wouldsignificantly influence the acoustic response, and subject to ambientacoustic noise and a magnetic field, the transfer function from theambient noise to the output of the earplug equalization circuit 32 willhave the relative response of an A-weighting filter 96, with appropriategain for processing the electrical signal.

When the earplug is in the ear 11, the compensation filter 98 isbypassed and a second response chosen by the designer can be achieved.The response of the microphone 6 when the earplug 16 is in the ear 11can compensate for changes in the ear canal 14 acoustics due to ablocked canal, when the earplug 16 is worn in the ear 11, compared to anunblocked canal, when the earplug 16 is not worn, for example.

There may be additional filtering between the A-weighted filter 96 andthe compensation filter 97 or prior to the A-weighted filter 96 or inother locations as determined by the designer for such purposes, forexample, of equalizing the microphone 6 response. The microphone 6output may be coupled directly through the microphone bias circuit 28 tothe equalization circuit 32, or the microphone 6 output may be coupledthrough additional circuits to the equalization circuit 32, through forexample, additional filters. In this embodiment of the invention, whenthe earplug 16 is subject to diffuse ambient acoustic noise and amagnetic field of sufficient strength to activate the proximity switch98, the transfer function from the ambient noise to the input of thesquaring circuit 34 will have the relative response of an A-weightingfilter.

A transfer function that has the relative response, or shape, of anA-weighting filter has a sensitivity at each frequency, relative to thesensitivity of the transfer function at 1,000 Hz, such as the one shownin ANSI S1.42 (Design Response of Weighting Networks for AcousticalMeasurements, Tables 1 and 2) within acceptable tolerances. Theappropriate A-weighting filter depends on the standards used by aparticular country or jurisdiction and may be referred to as a “targetresponse” or other name. Another example of a target response, dependingon the intended application of the invention, could be the relativeresponse of a C-weighting filter, where the C-weighting filtercharacteristics can be found in ANSI 1.42.

An example of an acceptable tolerance of the target response would bethe tolerance specified by a standards committee concerning noisedosimeters, such as ANSI S1.25 (Specification for Noise Dosimeters,Table 1), or other reputable standard concerning noise dosimetryrelevant to the country or jurisdiction the invention is to be used.Other target responses, other than the A-weighted relative response, maybe specified in different countries. Moreover, the specified A-weightingresponse in ANSI S1.42 and tolerances in ANSI S1.25 may be modified inthe future or new standards may be issued that supersede thesestandards.

The target response, in the preferred embodiment of the invention, isthe target transfer function, or frequency characteristics, measuredfrom the acoustic noise environment to the input of the squaring orother non-linear processing circuitry specified for a noise dosimeter ina reputable standard that governs noise dosimetry for a given country orjurisdiction. For the United States, at this time, a target response ofthe preferred embodiment is the A-weighting response and tolerancesspecified in section 4.2 and Table 1 of ANSI S1.25. Another targetresponse of another preferred embodiment would be the C-weightingresponse and tolerances specified in section 4.2 and Table 1 of ANSIS1.25.

ANSI Specifications S1.25 and S1.42 are incorporated herein byreference.

FIG. 27 shows another embodiment of the invention where the earplug 16houses a temperature sensor 100 in addition to the earplug microphone 6.In this embodiment, the temperature sensor 100 is coupled to an externalambient environment via an air path, provided by a channel 102 throughan eartip 10. The external environment is a human ear canal when theearplug 16 is worn in the ear, and is the room environment when theearplug 16 is outside of the ear.

A temperature sensor 100 output can be input to a logging circuit andother electrical circuits. When worn in the ear, the temperature sensor100 measures the temperature of the ear canal 14, which is an indicationof the human core temperature and can be used to determine if the userhas a fever. The temperature sensor 100 can also be used to determine ifthe earplug 16 is placed in the ear canal 14 or not, when using logging,because the temperature sensor 100 will be reading two differenttemperatures if the room temperature is not 98.6 degrees. Typically, thetemperature of the room of a work environment is below 98.6 degrees.

In this preferred environment, when the temperature sensor 100 outputindicates a temperature consistent with the earplug 16 being worn in theear, an appropriate filter is coupled to the earplug microphone 6. Whenthe temperature sensor 100 output indicates a temperature consistentwith the earplug 16 being worn outside of the ear, a second appropriatefilter is coupled to the earplug microphone 6. That is, the temperaturesensor 100 output is used to select one of two filter settings that arecoupled to the microphone 6, similar to the way that the proximityswitch 98 was used to modify the equalization circuit 32 response shownin FIG. 24 and FIG. 25. In this way, two equalization circuit responsesare achieved depending on the output of the temperature sensor 100,which correspond to whether the earplug is in the ear or not in the ear.

In a preferred embodiment, there is at least a 3 dB difference in theresponse of the two filters at at least one frequency between 2 kHz and5 kHz. This corresponds to a significant change in the noise exposurecalculation because a 3 dB shift can enable a worker to work twice aslong when using NIOSH guidelines.

Indicators are useful in dosimetry systems to alert the user when he/sheis approaching overexposure limits. LEDs located on the earplugs 16would be difficult to see, and wired indicators would be impractical.

FIG. 28 shows another embodiment in which in-ear dosimetry earplugs 16have wireless links 104 to remotely-located indicators 106, which couldbe LEDs or other light emitting devices, which can be used to alert theuser when they are approaching and/or have received maximum noise dose,or other information. The indicators 106, in this embodiment, arepowered using batteries and have a receiver to receive signals from theearplugs. The indicators 106 can be attached to convenient places withinthe line of sight of the user, such as on the brim of a hat 108 orattached to a piece of equipment that the user operates.

FIG. 29 shows an embodiment of the noise dosimetry system incorporatinga noise dosimetry earplug 16, a dock unit 18, remotely-locatedindicators 16 attached to a hat 108, an earplug reader unit 110 and acomputer 120. In this embodiment, an earplug is placed in the readerunit 110 for the purposes of storing the earplug, calibrating themicrophone 6 and earplug electronics 23, recharging the earplug battery24 and downloading data from the earplug 16. A reader transceiverantenna 116 communicates with the earplug transceiver antenna 42 forcharging the battery 24 and downloading data. An acoustic transducer,such as a speaker 112 in this embodiment, is used to generate signalsfor calibrating the earplug 16. The acoustic signal generated by thespeaker 112 is acoustically coupled to the microphone 6 of the earplug16 through a reader sound duct 122. Reader electronics 114 are connectedto the speaker 112 and reader transceiver antenna 116. The readerelectronics 114 communicate with a computer 120 via a connector 118 onthe reader 110. The computer 120, in this embodiment, is used to controlthe functions of the reader 110 and to store downloaded data from theearplug 16.

In another embodiment of the invention, the dock 18 can hold twoearplugs 16 and can be clipped to a shirt pocket or other location on auser's clothing. The dock 18 may also be attached to a hat or suspendedfrom a necklace.

Accordingly, it is to be understood that the embodiments of theinvention herein described are merely illustrative of the application ofthe principles of the invention. Reference herein to details of theillustrated embodiments is not intended to limit the scope of theclaims, which themselves recite those features regarded as essential tothe invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. An in-ear noise dosimetry system, comprising: anearplug comprising: an eartip for insertion into an ear canal of a humanbody, having a proximal end closest to an eardrum when the eartip isinserted in the ear canal, a distal end, and a sound delivery channelextending from the proximal end to the distal end; a microphoneacoustically coupled to the sound delivery channel at the distal end ofthe eartip, the microphone having a microphone electrical output; afirst wireless transmitter configured to send a wireless signalcorresponding to the microphone electrical output; and an earplug dockunit worn on the human body comprising: a second wireless receiverconfigured to receive wireless signals from the first wirelesstransmitter; and a processor configured to calculate noise exposure,wherein the noise exposure calculation is based on the microphoneelectrical output.
 2. The in-ear noise dosimetry system of claim 1, inwhich the microphone is coupled to an equalization circuit exhibitingone response when the earplug is in the ear canal and another responsewhen the earplug is not.
 3. The in-ear noise dosimetry system of claim1, in which the earplug dock unit provides a means for securing theearplug when the earplug is not worn in the ear.
 4. The in-ear noisedosimetry system of claim 3, in which the dock unit provides an acousticpath from the earplug sound delivery channel to the ambient environment.5. The in-ear noise dosimetry system of claim 1, in which the processorprovides a processing function comprising at least averaging, having aninput coupled to the microphone electrical output and an output.
 6. Thein-ear noise dosimetry system of claim 1, in which the processorprovides a processing function comprising at least squaring, having aninput coupled to the microphone electrical output and an output.
 7. Thein-ear noise dosimetry system of claim 1, in which the microphoneelectrical output is coupled to an averaging function through anequalization circuit and a signal squaring function.
 8. The in-earnoisedosimetry system of claim 1, in which the microphone electrical outputis coupled to an averaging function through an equalization circuit anda signal root mean square function.
 9. The in-ear noise dosimetry systemof claim 1, wherein the dock unit comprises an acoustic compensatoracoustically coupled to the microphone of the earplug when the earplugis stored in the dock unit.
 10. The in-ear noise dosimetry system ofclaim 1, wherein the dock unit comprises a neckloop attached to the dockunit.
 11. An in-ear noise dosimetry system, comprising: an earplugcomprising: an eartip for insertion into a human ear canal, having aproximal end closest to an eardrum when the eartip is inserted in theear canal, a distal end, and a sound delivery channel leading from theproximal end to the distal end; a microphone, acoustically coupled tothe sound delivery channel at the distal end of the eartip, having amicrophone electrical output; a processing function, having an input andan output; at least one equalization circuit having an input coupled tothe microphone electrical output and an output coupled to the processingfunction input; and a switch coupled to the at least one equalizationcircuit, the switch configured to change a state of activation as aresult of the eartip being inserted into or removed from the ear canal,the switch causing the at least one equalization circuit to exhibit afirst response when the switch is activated and exhibit a secondresponse when the switch is not activated.
 12. The in-ear noisedosimetry system of claim 11, wherein the first response differs fromthe second response by more than 3 dB at a frequency between 2 kHz and 5kHz.
 13. The in-ear noise dosimetry system of claim 11, in which theearplug further comprises a temperature sensor coupled to the switch,such that the switch is activated based on temperature sensed by thetemperature sensor.
 14. An in-ear noise dosimetry system, comprising: anearplug; and a dock unit configured to store the earplug, the earplugcomprising: an eartip for insertion into a human ear canal, having aproximal end closest to an eardrum when the eartip is inserted in theear canal, a distal end, and a sound delivery channel leading from theproximal end to the distal end; a microphone, acoustically coupled tothe sound delivery channel at the distal end of the eartip, having amicrophone electrical output; a processor having an input and an output;at least one equalization circuit having an input coupled to themicrophone electrical output and an output coupled to the processor; anda switch coupled to the at least one equalization circuit, the switchconfigured to change a state of activation as a result of the earplugbeing stored in the dock unit or removed from the dock unit, the switchcausing the at least one equalization circuit to exhibit a firstresponse when the switch is activated and to exhibit a second responsewhen the switch is not activated.
 15. The in-ear noise dosimetry systemof claim 14, wherein the first response differs from the second responseby more than 3 dB at a frequency between 2 kHz and 5 kHz.
 16. The in-earnoise dosimetry system of claim 14, wherein the switch is a magneticfield sensitive switch.
 17. The in-ear noise dosimetry system of claim14 wherein the dock unit provides an acoustic path from the earplugsound delivery channel to the ambient environment.
 18. An in-ear noisedosimetry system, comprising: an earplug comprising: an eartip forinsertion into an ear canal of a human body, the eartip having aproximal end closest to an eardrum when the eartip is inserted in theear canal, a distal end, and a sound delivery channel extending from theproximal end to the distal end; and a microphone, acoustically coupledto the sound delivery channel at the distal end of the eartip, themicrophone having a microphone electrical output; an earplug dock unitconfigured to be worn on the human body, the earplug dock unitcomprising: an earplug fastening element to fasten the earplug to theearplug dock unit; an acoustic compensator configured to modify anacoustic transfer function from an acoustic noise environment to theearplug microphone by incorporating at least one acoustical element; anda processor configured to calculate noise exposure based on themicrophone electrical output.
 19. The noise dosimetry system of claim18, in which the acoustic compensator modifies the acoustical responseat the microphone by more than 3 dB at a frequency between 2 kHz and 5kHz.
 20. The noise dosimetry system of claim 18, in which the earplug isstored with the majority of the eartip housed within a cavity in thedock unit.